• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

A quote that comes back within a day counts as a bad sign. An experienced provider will come back with clarifying questions before any number: about users and volumes. A provider that quotes without asking anything is working from a template, and a guess resurfaces as a change order — on your budget.

Be wary of a mismatch between the engineers on the sales call and the people who will code. Insist on specific people rather than roles in the contract, with a clause about substitutions. A vendor django vs laravel that will only describe a pool of resources and never names people is preserving the right to assign anyone it likes.

Insist on commit-level visibility from the start. A partner that shows code only at milestones is asking you to take delivery on faith. Regular commits and pull requests reveal the actual pace far better than any status report. The same holds for the build and deployment setup: if it does not exist, assurances about quality are just talk.

Ambiguous phrasing around code ownership is not an accident. The agreement must state explicitly that all deliverables become the property of the client upon settlement of the relevant invoice. Check also the jurisdiction and edtech software development the payment schedule: heavy prepayment with nothing due in return for weeks takes away the only leverage you have.

Lastly, crypto igaming platform development look at how they communicate. Establish what overlap the teams will share with your timezone, which person is expected to answer your questions and how quickly. A few hours of overlap generally works; zero overlap converts each small question into a lost day. Unclear written communication in the sales phase does not improve later.